[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] (v2) Design proposal for RMRR fix
> From: George Dunlap [mailto:george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 8:23 PM > > On 01/14/2015 12:14 PM, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 06:52 +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote: > >>> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:JBeulich@xxxxxxxx] > >>> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 12:06 AM > >>> > >>>>>> On 13.01.15 at 17:00, <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>> Another option I was thinking about: Before assigning a device to a > >>>> guest, you have to unplug the device and assign it to pci-back (e.g., > >>>> with xl pci-assignable-add). In addition to something like rmmr=host, > >>>> we could add rmrr=assignable, which would add all of the RMRRs of all > >>>> devices currently listed as "assignable". The idea would then be that > >>>> you first make all your devices assignable, then just start your guests, > >>>> and everything you've made assignable will be able to be assigned. > >>> > >>> Nice idea indeed, but I'm not sure about its practicability: It may > >>> not be desirable to make all devices eventually to be handed to a > >>> guest prior to starting any of the guests it may get handed to. In > >>> particular there may be reasons why the host needs the device > >>> while (or until after) creating the guests. > >>> > >> > >> and I'm not sure whether there's enough knowledge to judge whether > >> a device is assignable since potential conflicts may be detected only > >> when the guest is launched. > > > > I don't think George was intending to imply otherwise, assignable here > > just means "bound to xen-pciback", there may be other reasons why the > > device cannot be assigned in practice when you come to actually use it, > > i.e. RMRR conflicts which may only be discovered when a guest is started > > would be one such practical reason. > > Yes -- xl has a concept called "pci-assignable". Before you can add a > device to a guest, you have to call "xl pci-assignable-add [device > spec]". You can also run "xl pci-assignable-list" to see which devices > are currently assignable. > > Normally this is true even for statically-assigned devices: If you add > pci= [ "$bdi" ] to a config file, and $bdi hasn't been made assignable, > then the pci-attach in domain creation will fail and the domain will be > destroyed. You can make the domain builder do this automatically with > the "seize=1" parameter; i.e., pci = [ "$bdf,seize=1" ]. > > My suggestion was that in addition to specifying the particular ranges, > and specifying rmrr=host, we could also specify "rmrr=assignable", which > would cause the domain builder to internally run > libxl_pci_assignable_list() and find the RMRRs for all devices on the list. > > But as Ian says, that's a "nice to have", not a requirement. > I see. thanks _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |