|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 01/19] xen: dump vNUMA information with debug key "u"
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:45:25AM +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 14/01/15 11:24, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>>> On 14.01.15 at 12:06, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> May I suggest the following sylistic changes:
> >>
> >> 2 vnodes, 20 vcpus:
> >> 1: pnode 0, vcpus {1-9}
> >> 0000000000000000 - 000000005dc00000
> >> 2: pnode 1, vcpus {10-20}
> >> 000000005dc00000 - 00000000bb000000
> >> 0000000100000000 - 0000000100800000
> >>
> >> You have already stated 2 vnodes, so "vnode $X" is redundant as the list
> >> index. The vcpus are exceedingly likely to be consecutively allocated,
> >> and cpumask_scnprintf() is a very concise way of representing them (and
> >> will reduce your code quite a bit).
> > You mean bitmap_scnprintf() - cpumask_scnprintf() is not suitable for
> > dealing with vCPU-s.
>
> Yes, although I was actually thinking of the scnlistprintf() variant.
>
> However, I further notice that the source data is not in an appropriate
> form, so it is perhaps a less sensible suggestion.
>
Yes. I need to rearrange source data into bitmaps. And that seems to
involve dynamic memory allocation (?) that I would like to avoid in key
handler.
I adopt other suggestions you made. I also increased the output width to
4 for every number in case we have 3-digit number in the future. Now the
output looks like:
(XEN) Domain 1 (total: 768064):
(XEN) Node 0: 768064
(XEN) 2 vnodes, 20 vcpus, guest physical layout:
(XEN) 0: pnode 0
(XEN) 0000000000000000 - 000000005dc00000
(XEN) vcpus: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
(XEN) 8 9
(XEN) 1: pnode 0
(XEN) 000000005dc00000 - 00000000bb000000
(XEN) 0000000100000000 - 0000000100800000
(XEN) vcpus: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
(XEN) 18 19
Wei.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |