|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 07/19] libxl: x86: factor out e820_host_sanitize
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 09:00:49PM +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 13/01/15 12:11, Wei Liu wrote:
> > This function gets the machine E820 map and sanitize it according to PV
> > guest configuration.
> >
> > This will be used in later patch. No functional change introduced in
> > this patch.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Elena Ufimtseva <ufimtseva@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > tools/libxl/libxl_x86.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_x86.c b/tools/libxl/libxl_x86.c
> > index 9ceb373..e959e37 100644
> > --- a/tools/libxl/libxl_x86.c
> > +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_x86.c
> > @@ -207,6 +207,27 @@ static int e820_sanitize(libxl_ctx *ctx, struct
> > e820entry src[],
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static int e820_host_sanitize(libxl__gc *gc,
> > + libxl_domain_build_info *b_info,
> > + struct e820entry map[],
> > + uint32_t *nr)
> > +{
> > + int rc;
> > +
> > + rc = xc_get_machine_memory_map(CTX->xch, map, E820MAX);
>
> This function should not assume that map[] is E820MAX entries long. The
> code you copied was passing a local variable whereas here you are
> passing someone else's pointer. You should pass the length in *nr like
> e820_sanitize() does.
>
Good catch. I will fix.
Wei.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |