[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 04/10] xen/arm: Make gic-v2 code handle hip04-d01 platform
2015-01-13 11:54 GMT+00:00 Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>: > On Mon, 2014-11-03 at 10:11 +0000, Frediano Ziglio wrote: >> The GIC in this platform is mainly compatible with the standard >> GICv2 beside: >> - ITARGET is extended to 16 bit to support 16 CPUs; >> - SGI mask is extended to support 16 CPUs; >> - maximum supported interrupt is 510. > > I'm not super keen on sprinkling all of these > platform_has_quirk(PLATFORM_QUIRK_GICV2_16_CPU) and the related > de-constification throughout this driver. In reality your interrupt > controller might be "gic-like" but it is not actually a gic v2, it's > something custom. > The quirk part was removed, Julien imported v3 in http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=people/julieng/xen-unstable.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/hisilicon-d01-v3 > I see that the Linux side has gone the route of making this an entirely > separate driver. Since we have the gic_hw_operations abstraction these > days I am inclined towards suggesting we go a similar route in Xen (so > far the abstraction has supported gic v2 and v3, so you might find that > you want to refactor slight, e.g. by hoisting or pushing down some > functionality). The same goes for the GICH changes later on. > Do you think would be better to have another GIC driver instead. It would be mostly a copy&paste job. Yes, I didn't understand the reason behind changing GICH registers either but now the changes are in the silicon. > I'm even less keen on the related changes made to the vgic. My > overwhelming preference is for guests to only ever see the > architecturally standardised gic v2, v3 (and in the future v4 etc). This > would mean that on your platform a single guest could only make use of 8 > CPUs, but as a whole the host would be able to use all 16. I think > that's an acceptable tradeoff. > > (Hrm, looking a second time I don't really understand the patches you > are doing to the vgic and to what extent they contradict or support what > I say above, just moving the registers with no other changes seems odd > to me. In any case please just use the standard vgic) > > Ian. > Yes, there is no change in vgic. The GICV is 100% compatible to standard GICv2 and a normal GICv2 is presented to the guest. Frediano >> Signed-off-by: Frediano Ziglio <frediano.ziglio@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> xen/arch/arm/gic-v2.c | 70 >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- >> xen/arch/arm/gic.c | 5 +++- >> xen/include/asm-arm/gic.h | 4 ++- >> 3 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic-v2.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic-v2.c >> index faad1ff..eef55ed 100644 >> --- a/xen/arch/arm/gic-v2.c >> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic-v2.c >> @@ -79,16 +79,22 @@ static struct gic_info gicv2_info; >> * logical CPU numbering. Let's use mapping as returned by the GIC >> * itself >> */ >> -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u8, gic_cpu_id); >> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u16, gic_cpu_id); >> >> /* Maximum cpu interface per GIC */ >> -#define NR_GIC_CPU_IF 8 >> +static unsigned int nr_gic_cpu_if = 8; >> +static unsigned int gic_cpu_mask = 0xff; >> >> static inline void writeb_gicd(uint8_t val, unsigned int offset) >> { >> writeb_relaxed(val, gicv2.map_dbase + offset); >> } >> >> +static inline void writew_gicd(uint16_t val, unsigned int offset) >> +{ >> + writew_relaxed(val, gicv2.map_dbase + offset); >> +} >> + >> static inline void writel_gicd(uint32_t val, unsigned int offset) >> { >> writel_relaxed(val, gicv2.map_dbase + offset); >> @@ -132,7 +138,7 @@ static unsigned int gicv2_cpu_mask(const cpumask_t >> *cpumask) >> cpumask_and(&possible_mask, cpumask, &cpu_possible_map); >> for_each_cpu( cpu, &possible_mask ) >> { >> - ASSERT(cpu < NR_GIC_CPU_IF); >> + ASSERT(cpu < nr_gic_cpu_if); >> mask |= per_cpu(gic_cpu_id, cpu); >> } >> >> @@ -203,6 +209,15 @@ static unsigned int gicv2_read_irq(void) >> return (readl_gicc(GICC_IAR) & GICC_IA_IRQ); >> } >> >> +/* Set target CPU mask (RAZ/WI on uniprocessor) */ >> +static void gicv2_set_irq_mask(int irq, unsigned int mask) >> +{ >> + if ( platform_has_quirk(PLATFORM_QUIRK_GICV2_16_CPU) ) >> + writew_gicd(mask, GICD_ITARGETSR + irq * 2); >> + else >> + writeb_gicd(mask, GICD_ITARGETSR + irq); >> +} >> + >> /* >> * needs to be called with a valid cpu_mask, ie each cpu in the mask has >> * already called gic_cpu_init >> @@ -230,7 +245,7 @@ static void gicv2_set_irq_properties(struct irq_desc >> *desc, >> writel_gicd(cfg, GICD_ICFGR + (irq / 16) * 4); >> >> /* Set target CPU mask (RAZ/WI on uniprocessor) */ >> - writeb_gicd(mask, GICD_ITARGETSR + irq); >> + gicv2_set_irq_mask(irq, mask); >> /* Set priority */ >> writeb_gicd(priority, GICD_IPRIORITYR + irq); >> >> @@ -244,16 +259,22 @@ static void __init gicv2_dist_init(void) >> uint32_t gic_cpus; >> int i; >> >> - cpumask = readl_gicd(GICD_ITARGETSR) & 0xff; >> - cpumask |= cpumask << 8; >> - cpumask |= cpumask << 16; >> + cpumask = readl_gicd(GICD_ITARGETSR) & gic_cpu_mask; >> >> /* Disable the distributor */ >> writel_gicd(0, GICD_CTLR); >> >> type = readl_gicd(GICD_TYPER); >> gicv2_info.nr_lines = 32 * ((type & GICD_TYPE_LINES) + 1); >> - gic_cpus = 1 + ((type & GICD_TYPE_CPUS) >> 5); >> + if ( platform_has_quirk(PLATFORM_QUIRK_GICV2_16_CPU) ) >> + { >> + gic_cpus = 16; >> + BUG_ON( gicv2_info.nr_lines > 510 ); >> + } >> + else >> + { >> + gic_cpus = 1 + ((type & GICD_TYPE_CPUS) >> 5); >> + } >> printk("GICv2: %d lines, %d cpu%s%s (IID %8.8x).\n", >> gicv2_info.nr_lines, gic_cpus, (gic_cpus == 1) ? "" : "s", >> (type & GICD_TYPE_SEC) ? ", secure" : "", >> @@ -264,8 +285,19 @@ static void __init gicv2_dist_init(void) >> writel_gicd(0x0, GICD_ICFGR + (i / 16) * 4); >> >> /* Route all global IRQs to this CPU */ >> - for ( i = 32; i < gicv2_info.nr_lines; i += 4 ) >> - writel_gicd(cpumask, GICD_ITARGETSR + (i / 4) * 4); >> + if ( platform_has_quirk(PLATFORM_QUIRK_GICV2_16_CPU) ) >> + { >> + cpumask |= cpumask << 16; >> + for ( i = 32; i < gicv2_info.nr_lines; i += 2 ) >> + writel_gicd(cpumask, GICD_ITARGETSR + (i / 2) * 4); >> + } >> + else >> + { >> + cpumask |= cpumask << 8; >> + cpumask |= cpumask << 16; >> + for ( i = 32; i < gicv2_info.nr_lines; i += 4 ) >> + writel_gicd(cpumask, GICD_ITARGETSR + (i / 4) * 4); >> + } >> >> /* Default priority for global interrupts */ >> for ( i = 32; i < gicv2_info.nr_lines; i += 4 ) >> @@ -285,7 +317,7 @@ static void __cpuinit gicv2_cpu_init(void) >> { >> int i; >> >> - this_cpu(gic_cpu_id) = readl_gicd(GICD_ITARGETSR) & 0xff; >> + this_cpu(gic_cpu_id) = readl_gicd(GICD_ITARGETSR) & gic_cpu_mask; >> >> /* The first 32 interrupts (PPI and SGI) are banked per-cpu, so >> * even though they are controlled with GICD registers, they must >> @@ -348,6 +380,11 @@ static int gicv2_secondary_cpu_init(void) >> return 0; >> } >> >> +static inline unsigned gicd_sgi_target_shift(void) >> +{ >> + return 8 + 16 - nr_gic_cpu_if; >> +} >> + >> static void gicv2_send_SGI(enum gic_sgi sgi, enum gic_sgi_mode irqmode, >> const cpumask_t *cpu_mask) >> { >> @@ -366,7 +403,7 @@ static void gicv2_send_SGI(enum gic_sgi sgi, enum >> gic_sgi_mode irqmode, >> cpumask_and(&online_mask, cpu_mask, &cpu_online_map); >> mask = gicv2_cpu_mask(&online_mask); >> writel_gicd(GICD_SGI_TARGET_LIST | >> - (mask << GICD_SGI_TARGET_SHIFT) | sgi, >> + (mask << gicd_sgi_target_shift()) | sgi, >> GICD_SGIR); >> break; >> default: >> @@ -581,7 +618,7 @@ static void gicv2_irq_set_affinity(struct irq_desc >> *desc, const cpumask_t *cpu_m >> mask = gicv2_cpu_mask(cpu_mask); >> >> /* Set target CPU mask (RAZ/WI on uniprocessor) */ >> - writeb_gicd(mask, GICD_ITARGETSR + desc->irq); >> + gicv2_set_irq_mask(desc->irq, mask); >> >> spin_unlock(&gicv2.lock); >> } >> @@ -690,6 +727,12 @@ static int __init gicv2_init(struct dt_device_node >> *node, const void *data) >> >> dt_device_set_used_by(node, DOMID_XEN); >> >> + if ( platform_has_quirk(PLATFORM_QUIRK_GICV2_16_CPU) ) >> + { >> + nr_gic_cpu_if = 16; >> + gic_cpu_mask = 0xffff; >> + } >> + >> res = dt_device_get_address(node, 0, &gicv2.dbase, NULL); >> if ( res || !gicv2.dbase || (gicv2.dbase & ~PAGE_MASK) ) >> panic("GICv2: Cannot find a valid address for the distributor"); >> @@ -769,6 +812,7 @@ static const char * const gicv2_dt_compat[] __initconst = >> DT_COMPAT_GIC_CORTEX_A15, >> DT_COMPAT_GIC_CORTEX_A7, >> DT_COMPAT_GIC_400, >> + DT_COMPAT_GIC_HIP04, >> NULL >> }; >> >> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c >> index 70d10d6..cd934cf 100644 >> --- a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c >> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c >> @@ -563,12 +563,15 @@ static void do_sgi(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, enum >> gic_sgi sgi) >> void gic_interrupt(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, int is_fiq) >> { >> unsigned int irq; >> + unsigned int max_irq = platform_has_quirk(PLATFORM_QUIRK_GICV2_16_CPU) ? >> + 510 : >> + 1021; >> >> do { >> /* Reading IRQ will ACK it */ >> irq = gic_hw_ops->read_irq(); >> >> - if ( likely(irq >= 16 && irq < 1021) ) >> + if ( likely(irq >= 16 && irq < max_irq) ) >> { >> local_irq_enable(); >> do_IRQ(regs, irq, is_fiq); >> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/gic.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/gic.h >> index 187dc46..5adb628 100644 >> --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/gic.h >> +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/gic.h >> @@ -155,10 +155,12 @@ >> #define DT_COMPAT_GIC_400 "arm,gic-400" >> #define DT_COMPAT_GIC_CORTEX_A15 "arm,cortex-a15-gic" >> #define DT_COMPAT_GIC_CORTEX_A7 "arm,cortex-a7-gic" >> +#define DT_COMPAT_GIC_HIP04 "hisilicon,hip04-gic" >> >> #define DT_MATCH_GIC_V2 DT_MATCH_COMPATIBLE(DT_COMPAT_GIC_CORTEX_A15), \ >> DT_MATCH_COMPATIBLE(DT_COMPAT_GIC_CORTEX_A7), \ >> - DT_MATCH_COMPATIBLE(DT_COMPAT_GIC_400) >> + DT_MATCH_COMPATIBLE(DT_COMPAT_GIC_400), \ >> + DT_MATCH_COMPATIBLE(DT_COMPAT_GIC_HIP04) >> >> #define DT_COMPAT_GIC_V3 "arm,gic-v3" >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |