[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] x86/HVM: make hvm_efer_valid() honor guest features
On 12/01/15 08:00, Jan Beulich wrote: > Following the earlier similar change validating CR4 modifications. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > v2: consider CR0.PG during restore when checking EFER.LMA > > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c > @@ -1672,20 +1672,53 @@ static int hvm_save_cpu_ctxt(struct doma > return 0; > } > > -static bool_t hvm_efer_valid(struct domain *d, > - uint64_t value, uint64_t efer_validbits) > +static bool_t hvm_efer_valid(const struct vcpu *v, uint64_t value, > + signed int cr0_pg) > { > - if ( nestedhvm_enabled(d) && cpu_has_svm ) > - efer_validbits |= EFER_SVME; > + unsigned int ext1_ecx = 0, ext1_edx = 0; > > - return !((value & ~efer_validbits) || > - ((sizeof(long) != 8) && (value & EFER_LME)) || > - (!cpu_has_svm && (value & EFER_SVME)) || > - (!cpu_has_nx && (value & EFER_NX)) || > - (!cpu_has_syscall && (value & EFER_SCE)) || > - (!cpu_has_lmsl && (value & EFER_LMSLE)) || > - (!cpu_has_ffxsr && (value & EFER_FFXSE)) || > - ((value & (EFER_LME|EFER_LMA)) == EFER_LMA)); > + if ( cr0_pg < 0 && !is_hardware_domain(v->domain) ) > + { > + unsigned int level; > + > + ASSERT(v == current); > + hvm_cpuid(0x80000000, &level, NULL, NULL, NULL); > + if ( level >= 0x80000001 ) > + hvm_cpuid(0x80000001, NULL, NULL, &ext1_ecx, &ext1_edx); > + } > + else > + { > + ext1_edx = boot_cpu_data.x86_capability[X86_FEATURE_LM / 32]; > + ext1_ecx = boot_cpu_data.x86_capability[X86_FEATURE_SVM / 32]; > + } > + > + if ( (value & EFER_SCE) && > + !(ext1_edx & cpufeat_mask(X86_FEATURE_SYSCALL)) ) > + return 0; > + > + if ( (value & (EFER_LME | EFER_LMA)) && > + !(ext1_edx & cpufeat_mask(X86_FEATURE_LM)) ) > + return 0; > + > + if ( cr0_pg > 0 && (value & EFER_LMA) && (!(value & EFER_LME) || > !cr0_pg) ) > + return 0; > + > + if ( (value & EFER_NX) && !(ext1_edx & cpufeat_mask(X86_FEATURE_NX)) ) > + return 0; > + > + if ( (value & EFER_SVME) && > + (!(ext1_ecx & cpufeat_mask(X86_FEATURE_SVM)) || > + !nestedhvm_enabled(v->domain)) ) > + return 0; > + > + if ( (value & EFER_LMSLE) && !cpu_has_lmsl ) > + return 0; > + > + if ( (value & EFER_FFXSE) && > + !(ext1_edx & cpufeat_mask(X86_FEATURE_FFXSR)) ) > + return 0; > + > + return 1; > } > > /* These reserved bits in lower 32 remain 0 after any load of CR0 */ > @@ -1763,7 +1796,6 @@ static int hvm_load_cpu_ctxt(struct doma > struct vcpu *v; > struct hvm_hw_cpu ctxt; > struct segment_register seg; > - uint64_t efer_validbits; > > /* Which vcpu is this? */ > vcpuid = hvm_load_instance(h); > @@ -1794,9 +1826,7 @@ static int hvm_load_cpu_ctxt(struct doma > return -EINVAL; > } > > - efer_validbits = EFER_FFXSE | EFER_LMSLE | EFER_LME | EFER_LMA > - | EFER_NX | EFER_SCE; > - if ( !hvm_efer_valid(d, ctxt.msr_efer, efer_validbits) ) > + if ( !hvm_efer_valid(v, ctxt.msr_efer, MASK_EXTR(ctxt.cr0, X86_CR0_PG)) ) > { > printk(XENLOG_G_ERR "HVM%d restore: bad EFER %#" PRIx64 "\n", > d->domain_id, ctxt.msr_efer); > @@ -2936,12 +2966,10 @@ err: > int hvm_set_efer(uint64_t value) > { > struct vcpu *v = current; > - uint64_t efer_validbits; > > value &= ~EFER_LMA; > > - efer_validbits = EFER_FFXSE | EFER_LMSLE | EFER_LME | EFER_NX | EFER_SCE; > - if ( !hvm_efer_valid(v->domain, value, efer_validbits) ) > + if ( !hvm_efer_valid(v, value, -1) ) > { > gdprintk(XENLOG_WARNING, "Trying to set reserved bit in " > "EFER: %#"PRIx64"\n", value); > > > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |