Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/3] xen: use correct type for physical addresses

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 09.01.15 at 13:51, <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 09/01/15 09:57, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> On 08.01.15 at 18:01, <JGross@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> @@ -284,7 +286,7 @@ static void __init xen_update_mem_tables(unsigned long 
>>> pfn, unsigned long mfn)
>>>     }
>>>  
>>>     /* Update kernel mapping, but not for highmem. */
>>> -   if ((pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) >= __pa(high_memory))
>>> +   if (PFN_PHYS(pfn) >= (u64)(__pa(high_memory)))
>> 
>> I don't think you really need the cast on the right side - __pa()
>> should be returning a value of suitable type (and unsigned long
>> would be sufficient for anything up to and including high_memory).
> 
> I'd prefer:
> 
>     if (pfn >= PFN_DOWN(__pa(high_memory))

Even better indeed. Just one more point: Strictly speaking
__pa(high_memory) is invalid, as __pa() is defined for low
memory only. Hence perhaps PFN_UP(__pa(high_memory - 1))?

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel