Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC] xen-time: decreasing the rating of the xen clocksource below that of the tsc clocksource for dom0's

[Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 2015-01-07 at 17:16 +0100, Imre Palik wrote:
> From: "Palik, Imre" <imrep@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> In Dom0's the use of the TSC clocksource (whenever it is stable enough to
> be used) instead of the Xen clocksource should not cause any issues, as
> Dom0 VMs never live-migrated.

Is this still true given that dom0's vcpus are migrated amongst pcpus on
the host? The tsc are not synchronised on some generations of hardware
so the result there would be the TSC appearing to do very odd things
under dom0's feet. Does Linux cope with that or does it not matter for
some other reason?

> 
> Cc: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Imre Palik <imrep@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/x86/xen/time.c |    4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/time.c b/arch/x86/xen/time.c
> index f473d26..c768726 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/xen/time.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/time.c
> @@ -487,6 +487,10 @@ static void __init xen_time_init(void)
>       int cpu = smp_processor_id();
>       struct timespec tp;
>  
> +     /* As Dom0 is never moved, no penalty on using TSC there */
> +     if (xen_initial_domain())
> +             xen_clocksource.rating = 275;
> +
>       clocksource_register_hz(&xen_clocksource, NSEC_PER_SEC);
>  
>       if (HYPERVISOR_vcpu_op(VCPUOP_stop_periodic_timer, cpu, NULL) == 0) {



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel