Re: [Xen-devel] [TestDay] VMX test report for Xen 4.5.0-rc1

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 12.11.14 at 07:58, <robert.hu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 2. Failed to hotplug a VT-d device with XEN4.5-RC1
>   http://bugzilla-archived.xenproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1894 

First of all I'm not sure it is really useful to use the old, discontinued
bugzilla to report bugs. I think it would be much easier if you reported
them directly (and individually) to the mailing list, with or without
triggering the creation of bugs in the new tracking system.

As to the specific bug above - nothing is being said on whether a
driver was still attached to the device at the time it was being
hot-unplugged; if there was, I'm not sure what the expected
behavior would be (i.e. on real hardware).

> 3. Fail to hot add multi devices to guest
>   http://bugzilla-archived.xenproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1895 

The description in contradicting itself - title and parts of it say
the operation failed, but "Bug detailed description" says "Checking
inside guest VM, the VT-D device is attached to guest VM actually,
and works fine."

> 4. Not all PFs are available if assign multi VT-d devices to Wndows guest VM
>   http://bugzilla-archived.xenproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1896 

I think we were told the other day that pass-through of PFs is
not being supported by Intel. What's the purpose of reporting
bugs there?

> 7. Error msg occurred after attaching multi SR-IOV VF device to running guest
>   http://bugzilla-archived.xenproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1899 

This reads (except for the title) the same as 1895. Am I overlooking
something here?

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel