[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v7 3/8] arm64: introduce is_device_dma_coherent
On Mon, 10 Nov 2014, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > BTW, pfn_valid() is more expensive than simply comparing the mfn with
> > pfn for dom0. The calling code knows this already and it may be quicker
> > to simply pass a "bool foreign" argument.
>
> Good point, I can compare mfn and pfn here.
> I cannot do the same in unmap_page and the various sync operations,
> because there is no pfn available, but maybe I could use
> set_page_private to set a flag. I'll think about it.
But of course there is no struct page either so I think pfn_valid will
have to stay in unmap and sync
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
