[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 05/44] mfd: as3722: Drop reference to pm_power_off from devicetree bindings
- To: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- From: Rob Landley <rob@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 11:21:11 -0500
- Cc: linux-m32r-ja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-efi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xtensa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>, devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, lguest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-c6x-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-hexagon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-sh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@xxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, user-mode-linux-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, adi-buildroot-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-m68k@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-am33-list@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-tegra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, openipmi-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-metag@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-parisc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-cris-kernel@xxxxxxxx, Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-alpha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 16:23:12 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>
On 10/07/14 00:28, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Devicetree bindings are supposed to be operating system independent
> and should thus not describe how a specific functionality is implemented
> in Linux.
So your argument is that linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings should
not be specific to Linux. Merely hosted in the Linux kernel source
repository.
Well that's certainly a point of view.
Rob
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
