[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC][PATCH 1/1] Add IOREQ_TYPE_VMWARE_PORT
On 09/29/14 07:13, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 26/09/2014 20:51, Don Slutz ha scritto:
+ memcpy(®s->rax, &vio->io_data, vio->io_size);
Shouldn't this match the code you use below for case
HVMIO_handle_vmport_awaiting_completion?
Nope. This path is either:
vio->io_state == HVMIO_completed at entry or the the error path
for "If there is no backing DM". In both cases what to put in rax
is in vio->io_data with vio->io_size set also.
This code comes from hvmemul_do_io().
-Don Slutz
Paolo
+ return X86EMUL_OKAY;
+}
+
static int hvmemul_do_io(
int is_mmio, paddr_t addr, unsigned long *reps, int size,
paddr_t ram_gpa, int dir, int df, void *p_data)
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/io.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/io.c
index 9f565d6..96ef3ff 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/io.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/io.c
@@ -206,6 +206,25 @@ void hvm_io_assist(ioreq_t *p)
else
memcpy(&guest_cpu_user_regs()->rax, &p->data, vio->io_size);
break;
+ case HVMIO_handle_vmport_awaiting_completion:
+ {
+ struct cpu_user_regs *regs = guest_cpu_user_regs();
+
+ /* Always zero extension for eax */
+ regs->rax = (uint32_t)(p->addr >> 32);
+ /* Only zero extension if 32bit register changed */
+ if ( (uint32_t)regs->rbx != (uint32_t)p->addr )
+ regs->rbx = (uint32_t)p->addr;
+ if ( (uint32_t)regs->rcx != (uint32_t)p->count )
+ regs->rcx = (uint32_t)p->count;
+ if ( (uint32_t)regs->rdx != (uint32_t)p->size )
+ regs->rdx = (uint32_t)p->size;
+ if ( (uint32_t)regs->rsi != (uint32_t)(p->data >> 32) )
+ regs->rsi = (uint32_t)(p->data >> 32);
+ if ( (uint32_t)regs->rdi != (uint32_t)p->data )
+ regs->rdi = (uint32_t)p->data;
+ }
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|