Re: [Xen-devel] Coverity complaints about Remus in xen-unstable

[David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 02/10/14 10:34, Ian Jackson wrote:
> 
> Is there a way to fix this in Coverity's modelling or should we report
> it as a false positive ?

I don't think this is a false positive -- coverity has correctly
identified the variable as unused.  Perhaps you should tag the issue as
"Intentional"?

Longer term, I think libxl should move away from its profusion of macros
that declare local variables -- I think you nicely demonstrated that
they are confusing and that it's easy to forgot what they actually do.

David

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel