Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8 05/10] xen/arm: physical irq follow virtual irq

[Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 11 Jul 2014, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 07/10/2014 07:13 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> >  void vgic_disable_irqs(struct vcpu *v, uint32_t r, int n)
> >  {
> >      const unsigned long mask = r;
> > @@ -277,6 +297,7 @@ void vgic_enable_irqs(struct vcpu *v, uint32_t r, int n)
> >          }
> >          if ( p->desc != NULL )
> >          {
> > +            irq_set_affinity(p->desc, cpumask_of(v_target->processor));
> >              spin_lock_irqsave(&p->desc->lock, flags);
> >              p->desc->handler->enable(p->desc);
> >              spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->desc->lock, flags);
> > diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/gic.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/gic.h
> > index 6410280..8d93ccd 100644
> > --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/gic.h
> > +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/gic.h
> > @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ struct gic_hw_operations {
> >  void register_gic_ops(const struct gic_hw_operations *ops);
> >  
> >  struct vcpu *vgic_get_target_vcpu(struct vcpu *v, unsigned int irq);
> > +void arch_move_irqs(struct vcpu *v);
> 
> I would stay consistent with x86 by moving this declaration in irq.h.

OK

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel