Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 28813: regressions - trouble: blocked/broken/fail/pass

[Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 2014-07-04 at 11:35 +0100, xen.org wrote:
> flight 28813 xen-unstable real [real]
> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/28813/
> 
> Regressions :-(
> 
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
>  build-i386-libvirt            5 libvirt-build             fail REGR. vs. 
> 27467
>  build-amd64-libvirt           5 libvirt-build             fail REGR. vs. 
> 27467
>  build-armhf-libvirt           5 libvirt-build             fail REGR. vs. 
> 27467

http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/28813/build-amd64-libvirt/5.ts-libvirt-build.log
 shows:

  CC     libxl/libvirt_driver_libxl_impl_la-libxl_driver.lo
libxl/libxl_domain.c: In function 'libxlDomainSetVcpuAffinities':
libxl/libxl_domain.c:1032:9: error: too few arguments to function 
'libxl_set_vcpuaffinity'
In file included from libxl/libxl_domain.h:27:0,
                 from libxl/libxl_domain.c:28:
/home/osstest/build.28813.build-amd64-libvirt/xendist/usr/local/include/libxl.h:1180:5:
 note: declared here


And 
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/28813/build-amd64-libvirt/info.html
 shows:
                revision_libvirt
        b963ca06d4b99e8db71c85b8800aae3c99de6bcb

So I suppose:
        commit 9375ba2a6e0c1dba9e9e6feb1b4a698b64c47085
        Author: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@xxxxxxxxxx>
        Date:   Fri Dec 20 16:01:46 2013 +0100
        
            libxl: correctly handle affinity reset in virDomainPinVcpu[Flags]

wasn't as effective as we had hoped :-(

I suppose the issue is that this patch was only against
src/libxl/libxl_driver.c and not libxl/libxl_domain.c

Ian.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel