|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 03/16] xen/arm: make sgi handling generic
On Mon, 26 May 2014, vijay.kilari@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Vijaya Kumar K <Vijaya.Kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> move all the hw specific sgi handling functionality
> to one function and use it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vijaya Kumar K <Vijaya.Kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> xen/arch/arm/gic.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> xen/include/asm-arm/gic.h | 8 ++++++++
> 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
> index efcd785..f8e49df 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
> @@ -483,21 +483,40 @@ void __init gic_init(void)
> spin_unlock(&gic.lock);
> }
>
> -void send_SGI_mask(const cpumask_t *cpumask, enum gic_sgi sgi)
> +static void send_SGI(const cpumask_t *cpu_mask, enum gic_sgi sgi,
> + uint8_t irqmode)
> {
> unsigned int mask = 0;
> +
> + switch ( irqmode )
> + {
> + case SGI_TARGET_OTHERS:
> + GICD[GICD_SGIR] = GICD_SGI_TARGET_OTHERS | sgi;
> + break;
> + case SGI_TARGET_SELF:
> + GICD[GICD_SGIR] = GICD_SGI_TARGET_SELF | sgi;
> + break;
> + case SGI_TARGET_LIST:
> + mask = gic_cpu_mask(cpu_mask);
> + GICD[GICD_SGIR] = GICD_SGI_TARGET_LIST |
> + (mask<<GICD_SGI_TARGET_SHIFT) | sgi;
> + break;
> + default:
> + BUG_ON(1);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +void send_SGI_mask(const cpumask_t *cpumask, enum gic_sgi sgi)
> +{
> cpumask_t online_mask;
>
> ASSERT(sgi < 16); /* There are only 16 SGIs */
>
> cpumask_and(&online_mask, cpumask, &cpu_online_map);
> - mask = gic_cpu_mask(&online_mask);
>
> dsb(sy);
>
> - GICD[GICD_SGIR] = GICD_SGI_TARGET_LIST
> - | (mask<<GICD_SGI_TARGET_SHIFT)
> - | sgi;
> + send_SGI(&online_mask, sgi, SGI_TARGET_LIST);
> }
>
> void send_SGI_one(unsigned int cpu, enum gic_sgi sgi)
> @@ -512,18 +531,18 @@ void send_SGI_self(enum gic_sgi sgi)
>
> dsb(sy);
>
> - GICD[GICD_SGIR] = GICD_SGI_TARGET_SELF
> - | sgi;
> + send_SGI(cpumask_of(smp_processor_id()), sgi, SGI_TARGET_SELF);
> }
Given that the mask is unused in this case, I think it would be
acceptable to pass NULL.
> void send_SGI_allbutself(enum gic_sgi sgi)
> {
> + cpumask_t all_others_mask;
> ASSERT(sgi < 16); /* There are only 16 SGIs */
>
> + cpumask_andnot(&all_others_mask, &cpu_possible_map,
> cpumask_of(smp_processor_id()));
> dsb(sy);
>
> - GICD[GICD_SGIR] = GICD_SGI_TARGET_OTHERS
> - | sgi;
> + send_SGI(&all_others_mask, sgi, SGI_TARGET_OTHERS);
Same here. Especially in this case you would avoid the useless
cpumask_andnot call.
In any case
Acked-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> }
>
> void smp_send_state_dump(unsigned int cpu)
> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/gic.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/gic.h
> index 8e37ccf..c7b7368 100644
> --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/gic.h
> +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/gic.h
> @@ -210,6 +210,14 @@ enum gic_sgi {
> GIC_SGI_DUMP_STATE = 1,
> GIC_SGI_CALL_FUNCTION = 2,
> };
> +
> +/* SGI irq mode types */
> +enum gic_sgi_mode {
> + SGI_TARGET_LIST,
> + SGI_TARGET_OTHERS,
> + SGI_TARGET_SELF,
> +};
> +
> extern void send_SGI_mask(const cpumask_t *cpumask, enum gic_sgi sgi);
> extern void send_SGI_one(unsigned int cpu, enum gic_sgi sgi);
> extern void send_SGI_self(enum gic_sgi sgi);
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |