|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Regression since Linux Kernel 3.12 due to 64bit pvguest NMIs
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 10:18:53AM +0200, Sebastian Faerber wrote:
> >
> > Could you patch your kernel with this patch to double check that it is OK?
> >
> > Is it OK for me to put 'Reported-and-Tested-by: Sebastian Faerber <email>'
> > on it?
>
> Your patch works, thanks for taking care of the issue, much appreciated!
> Sure, you can include me in your commit.
Excellent.
> Could you also CC this patch to the stable kernel people? Would be
> great if i could
> run unmodified kernels once the commit gets picked up.
>
Sure.
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> > index 201d09a..c19ae00 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> > @@ -746,11 +746,14 @@ static int cvt_gate_to_trap(int vector, const
> > gate_desc *val,
> > */
> > ;
> > #endif
> > - } else if (addr == (unsigned long)nmi)
> > + } else if (addr == (unsigned long)nmi) {
> > /*
> > - * Use the native version as well.
> > + * Use the native version as well, but for RHEL5
> > + * hypervisors it is not implemented.
> > */
> > - ;
> > + if (!xen_running_on_version_or_later(4,0))
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > else {
> > /* Some other trap using IST? */
> > if (WARN_ON(val->ist != 0))
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/setup.c b/arch/x86/xen/setup.c
> > index 0982233..aa3fd34 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/xen/setup.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/xen/setup.c
> > @@ -576,6 +576,8 @@ void xen_enable_syscall(void)
> > }
> > void xen_enable_nmi(void)
> > {
> > + if (!xen_running_on_version_or_later(4,0))
> > + return;
> > #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> > if (register_callback(CALLBACKTYPE_nmi, (char *)nmi))
> > BUG();
> >
> >
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |