Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v6 05/10] Clear AC bit in RFLAGS to protect Xen itself by SMAP

["Wu, Feng" <feng.wu@xxxxxxxxx>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:JBeulich@xxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 3:09 PM
> To: Wu, Feng
> Cc: Andrew Cooper; ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx; Dong, Eddie; Nakajima, Jun; Tian,
> Kevin; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 05/10] Clear AC bit in RFLAGS to protect Xen itself by
> SMAP
> 
> >>> On 08.05.14 at 08:58, <feng.wu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Yes, I agree that it is pointless to defer STAC here. I am definitely fine
> > with making SAVE_ALL
> > Parameter a tristate. If you think it is better I am willing the change the
> > patch. However, my
> > question is that is it better to implement SAVE_ALL that way? Just a
> > technical question!:)
> 
> It's not really a technical one, it's a matter of taste. And _I_ would be
> doing it that way, but I guess others may frown upon such tristates.
> 
> Jan

That's fine to me, I will change it in the next post.

Thanks,
Feng

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel