Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/6] [VERY RFC] Migration Stream v2

[David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 14/04/14 18:49, George Dunlap wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Andrew Cooper
> <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 10/04/14 11:42, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2014-04-09 at 19:28 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>>> Some design decisions have been take very deliberately (e.g. splitting the
>>>> logic for PV and hvm migration) while others have been more along the 
>>>> lines of
>>>> "I think its a sensible thing to do given a lack of any evidence/opinion to
>>>> the contrary".
>>> Is there some indication of which is which?
>>
>> Not really, given the clean rewrite, and also that it is only partially
>> complete.
>>
>>>
>>> Should we check in the desigh/spec which was previously posted as part
>>> of this?
>>
>> I knew I forgot something...
>>
>> http://xenbits.xen.org/people/andrewcoop/domain-save-format-E.pdf
> 
> 
> What did you imagine might constitute an "Optional" record?

This was something Ian Jackson asked for and it seems like a useful
capabilitity to have for future use.  Not sure what it might be used for
yet.

David

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel