Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 08/16] xen/arm: IRQ Introduce irq_get_domain

[Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 04/07/2014 02:15 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 21:41 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
>> This function retrieves a domain from an IRQ. It will be used in several
>> places (such as do_IRQ) to avoid duplicated code when multiple action will be
>> supported.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
>> ---
>>     Changes in v2:
>>         - Patch added
>> ---
>>  xen/arch/arm/irq.c |   11 ++++++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/irq.c b/xen/arch/arm/irq.c
>> index f3a30bd..5111b90 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/irq.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/irq.c
>> @@ -98,6 +98,15 @@ void __cpuinit init_secondary_IRQ(void)
>>      BUG_ON(init_local_irq_data() < 0);
>>  }
>>  
>> +static inline struct domain *irq_get_domain(struct irq_desc *desc)
>> +{
>> +    ASSERT(spin_is_locked(&desc->lock));
>> +    ASSERT(desc->status & IRQ_GUEST);
> 
> I don't know if this will be helpful for any of the forthcoming callers
> but you could return DOMID_XEN if this isn't the case.

This function was created to retrieve easily the domain (mainly when we
will switch to a list for the action).
As it's only used withing the file and it should only be called when
desc->status == IRQ_GUEST, I don't think we need to return DOMID_XEN.

Regards,

-- 
Julien Grall

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel