Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-linus test] 25340: regressions - FAIL

[Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sun, 2014-03-02 at 10:17 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> I could just bump the number of registered MACs up, but I think it would
> be better to understand what is going on. Any ideas?

Ah, the MAC addresses are per flight not per job, so it's other jobs
which have used them. I looked through 25340 and the largest I saw
was ...:20. So:

-----8<-------------------

From 4c9f108f119d704bf87bdaea4ab810ed1b0ed28d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2014 10:21:27 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] CXFabric: Register more MAC addresses with the fabric

I've seen 0x20 used in a single flight. Register up to 0x40.

Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 Osstest/CXFabric.pm | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Osstest/CXFabric.pm b/Osstest/CXFabric.pm
index 866aefe..6c8400e 100644
--- a/Osstest/CXFabric.pm
+++ b/Osstest/CXFabric.pm
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ sub setup_cxfabric($)
     # is unlikely to be anything other than exactly our marilith box.
     return unless $ho->{Flags}{'equiv-marilith'};
 
-    my $nr = 8;
+    my $nr = 64;
 
     my $prefix = ether_prefix($ho);
     logm("Registering $nr MAC addresses with CX fabric using prefix $prefix");
-- 
1.8.5.2




_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel