Re: [Xen-devel] Domain Save Image Format proposal (draft C)

[David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 27/02/14 16:21, Ian Jackson wrote:
> David Vrabel writes ("Domain Save Image Format proposal (draft C)"):
> 
>> checksum     CRC-32C checksum of the record head, body (including any
>>              trailing padding) and the footer (except for the checksum
>>              field itself), or 0x00000000 if the checksum field is
>>              invalid.
> 
> I still question whether it is really sensible to have a set of
> per-record checksums which do not cover all of the file (eg, excluding
> the image header, and the file structure).

I'm going to drop the checksum field.  There doesn't seem to be much
interest in it.

David

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel