Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xl: suppress suspend/resume functions on platforms which do not support it.

[Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 16:49 +0000, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 02/12/2014 03:57 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 16:21 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
> >> On Wed, Feb 12, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >>
> >>>   #define LIBXL_HAVE_SIGCHLD_SHARING 1
> >>>   
> >>> +/*
> >>> + * LIBXL_HAVE_NO_SUSPEND_RESUME
> >> Think positive?
> >> Make that HAVE_FEATURE and define it on x86.
> > Could do -- anyone got any strong feeling one way or the other?
> 
> I'm a fan of consistency, so "HAVE_SUSPEND" sounds a little bit better 
> to me.  But either way is fine.

Right. I think I'll flip it then, it does make more logical sense that
way.

Ian.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel