Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: arm: arm64: Adding VFP save/restore support.

[Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hello,

On 06/02/14 07:28, Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar wrote:
> This patch adds VFP save/restore support form arm64 across context switch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar <pranavkumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>   xen/arch/arm/arm64/vfp.c        |   49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   xen/include/asm-arm/arm64/vfp.h |    4 ++++
>   2 files changed, 53 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/arm64/vfp.c b/xen/arch/arm/arm64/vfp.c
> index 74e6a50..8c1479a 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/arm64/vfp.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/arm64/vfp.c
> @@ -1,13 +1,62 @@
>   #include <xen/sched.h>
>   #include <asm/processor.h>
> +#include <asm/cpufeature.h>
>   #include <asm/vfp.h>
>
>   void vfp_save_state(struct vcpu *v)
>   {
>       /* TODO: implement it */
> +    if ( !cpu_has_fp )
> +        return;
> +
> +    asm volatile("stp q0, q1, [%0, #16 * 0]\n\t"
> +                 "stp q2, q3, [%0, #16 * 2]\n\t"
> +                 "stp q4, q5, [%0, #16 * 4]\n\t"
> +                 "stp q6, q7, [%0, #16 * 6]\n\t"
> +                 "stp q8, q9, [%0, #16 * 8]\n\t"
> +                 "stp q10, q11, [%0, #16 * 10]\n\t"
> +                 "stp q12, q13, [%0, #16 * 12]\n\t"
> +                 "stp q14, q15, [%0, #16 * 14]\n\t"
> +                 "stp q16, q17, [%0, #16 * 16]\n\t"
> +                 "stp q18, q19, [%0, #16 * 18]\n\t"
> +                 "stp q20, q21, [%0, #16 * 20]\n\t"
> +                 "stp q22, q23, [%0, #16 * 22]\n\t"
> +                 "stp q24, q25, [%0, #16 * 24]\n\t"
> +                 "stp q26, q27, [%0, #16 * 26]\n\t"
> +                 "stp q28, q29, [%0, #16 * 28]\n\t"
> +                 "stp q30, q31, [%0, #16 * 30]\n\t"
> +                 :: "r" ((char *)(&v->arch.vfp.fpregs)): "memory");
I remember we had a discussion when I have implemented vfp context 
switch for arm32 for the memory constraints 
(http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2013-06/msg00110.html).
I think you should use "=Q" also here to avoid cloberring the whole memory.

At the same time, is it necessary the (char *)?

> +
> +    v->arch.vfp.fpsr = READ_SYSREG32(FPSR);
> +    v->arch.vfp.fpcr = READ_SYSREG32(FPCR);
> +    v->arch.vfp.fpexc32_el2 = READ_SYSREG32(FPEXC32_EL2);
>   }
>
>   void vfp_restore_state(struct vcpu *v)
>   {
>       /* TODO: implement it */
> +    if ( !cpu_has_fp )
> +        return;
> +
> +    asm volatile("ldp q0, q1, [%0, #16 * 0]\n\t"
> +                 "ldp q2, q3, [%0, #16 * 2]\n\t"
> +                 "ldp q4, q5, [%0, #16 * 4]\n\t"
> +                 "ldp q6, q7, [%0, #16 * 6]\n\t"
> +                 "ldp q8, q9, [%0, #16 * 8]\n\t"
> +                 "ldp q10, q11, [%0, #16 * 10]\n\t"
> +                 "ldp q12, q13, [%0, #16 * 12]\n\t"
> +                 "ldp q14, q15, [%0, #16 * 14]\n\t"
> +                 "ldp q16, q17, [%0, #16 * 16]\n\t"
> +                 "ldp q18, q19, [%0, #16 * 18]\n\t"
> +                 "ldp q20, q21, [%0, #16 * 20]\n\t"
> +                 "ldp q22, q23, [%0, #16 * 22]\n\t"
> +                 "ldp q24, q25, [%0, #16 * 24]\n\t"
> +                 "ldp q26, q27, [%0, #16 * 26]\n\t"
> +                 "ldp q28, q29, [%0, #16 * 28]\n\t"
> +                 "ldp q30, q31, [%0, #16 * 30]\n\t"
> +                 :: "r" ((char *)(&v->arch.vfp.fpregs)): "memory");
Same here.

Regards,

--
Julien Grall

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel