Re: [Xen-devel] Question on Lazy VM Restore

[Andres Lagar Cavilla <andres@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 13/12/2013 16:06, Prateek Sharma wrote:
> Hello all,
>     I was wondering if there is an existing mechanism in Xen for
> restoring a saved/checkpointed VM lazily. By that, I mean that the
> pages of the VM should be mapped only on access.
>     Currently, restoring a VM from a snapshot seems to take a long
> time [~20 seconds for 2 GB].
>     Assuming that there is no lazy-restore functionality, what would
> be a good way to implement this? Using parts of Xen-paging? Snowflock?
> Something else?
>
> Thanks!
> --Prateek

There is no current mechanism which I am aware of.  I recall a few
academic papers looking in to the possibility, but no code as a result.

The restoring from a shapshot has a number of large inefficiencies in
the datapath in the privcmd driver.  Fixing these would make quite an
improvement on those 20 seconds, which I suspect might be a rather
easier improvement than implementing lazy restore.

Having said that, if you are looking for a project to do, I suspect the
xen-paging infrastructure would be able to be used for lazy restore,
although Andres (author of xen-paging, CC'd) will likely be able to
speak rather more about the feasibility of it.

Thanks Andrew. Credit where is due, Olaf Hering from Suse had most to do with xen-paging.

Prateek: yes you could use xen-paging to build a lazy restore. Snowflock has mutated/evolved into Gridcentric's commercial offering, so happy to discuss that off list.

Best,

Andres

~Andrew

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel