|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5] xen/arm: Allow balooning working with 1:1 memory mapping
>>> On 16.12.13 at 18:00, Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> With the lack of iommu, dom0 must have a 1:1 memory mapping for all
> these guest physical address. When the ballon decides to give back a
> page to the kernel, this page must have the same address as previously.
> Otherwise, we will loose the 1:1 mapping and will break DMA-capable
> devices.
>
> Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
if you do one more change (and a little bit of further cleanup -
sorry I didn't notice this before):
> @@ -122,7 +126,29 @@ static void populate_physmap(struct memop_args *a)
> }
> else
> {
> - page = alloc_domheap_pages(d, a->extent_order, a->memflags);
> + if ( is_domain_direct_mapped(d) )
> + {
> + mfn = gpfn;
> + if ( !mfn_valid(mfn) )
> + {
> + gdprintk(XENLOG_INFO, "Invalid mfn 0x%"PRI_xen_pfn"\n",
"... %#"PRI_xen_pfn"\n" please.
> + mfn);
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + page = mfn_to_page(mfn);
> + if ( !get_page(page, d) )
> + {
> + gdprintk(XENLOG_INFO,
> + "mfn 0x%"PRI_xen_pfn" doesn't belong to the"
> + " domain\n", mfn);
Same here.
> --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h
> +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h
> @@ -86,6 +86,9 @@ enum domain_type {
> #define is_pv64_domain(d) (0)
> #endif
>
> +extern int dom0_11_mapping;
> +#define is_domain_direct_mapped(d) (dom0_11_mapping && (d) == dom0)
This needs to be
#define is_domain_direct_mapped(d) ((d) == dom0 && dom0_11_mapping)
in order to make sure d is evaluated exactly once.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |