Re: [Xen-devel] Best board for ARM ?

[Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@xxxxxxxxxx>]

[Adding Julien]

On lun, 2013-12-09 at 15:53 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 16:44 +0100, Claudio Scordino wrote:
> > Our question at this point is: which is the most tested and
> > recommended ARM platform among the ones listed ?
> 
> Arndale and midway are probably the best. However both are difficult to
> get hold of in their own way... Arndale's seem to take ages to ship,
> while I don't think Midway is available to buy yet, and in any case they
> are server class (i.e. not cheap).
> 
Since it's embedded, midway is particularly bad suited, I think, even
for prototypes (apart it being expensive and not yet available). :-)

> Arndale is probably the best bet. Allwinner based stuff (aka sunxi) is
> less well tested overall but might have better availability, it is also
> super cheap in most cases (e.g. cubieboard2/truck).
> 
Ok, thanks Ian for the info!

In case one wants to go for cubie, this is where all the information
lives, right?
http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Xen_ARM_with_Virtualization_Extensions/Allwinner

Is it still current? Have things got any better lately, from either
Linux or Xen side?

While this is, I think, the same for Arndale:
http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Xen_ARM_with_Virtualization_Extensions/Arndale
which does look less "hacky", at least at a first glance...

Claudio, perhaps you can investigate how easy it would be for you to get
an Arndale board, and fallback on cubie2/truck if it's actually that
hard?

Thanks again Ian,
Dario

-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel