Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 22184: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass

[Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 2013-12-02 at 09:36 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 30.11.13 at 04:44, xen.org <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > flight 22184 xen-unstable real [real]
> > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/22184/ 
> > 
> > Regressions :-(
> > 
> > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> > including tests which could not be run:
> >  test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3  7 windows-install     fail REGR. vs. 
> > 22106
> 
> Still some fallout from the qemu upgrade?
> 
> Nov 29 13:22:30.209757 [ 1926.179052] qemu-system-i38[3261]: segfault at 
> 7f3b9ae5f000 ip 00007f3b9f3f8c11 sp 00007fffbc358b68 error 6 in 
> libc-2.11.3.so[7f3b9f379000+159000]
> 
> >  test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64  9 guest-localmigrate       fail REGR. vs. 
> > 22106
> 
> Here I'm also suspecting something in qemu going wrong: For a
> local migrate test, there would seem to be too many guest reboots
> being invoked (according to the various qemu-dm log files, namely
> itch-mite---var-log-xen-qemu-dm-win.guest.osstest--incoming.log).
> 
> But then again - are the tests here using the newer qemu already?
> QEMU_TAG in ./Config.mk seems to suggest they wouldn't (yet I
> thought we got a push on the qemu-upstream tree)...

http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/22184/build-amd64/info.html 
shows built_revision_qemuu b97307ecaad98360f41ea36cd9674ef810c4f8cf, which 
appears to follow the qemu-1.6 merge changeset, so I think we are testing the 
new version despite what Config.mk says. Which is good argument for updating 
Config.mk such that users actually get what we have tested!

Ian.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel