[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PROPOSAL] Event channel for SMP-VMs: per-vCPU or per-OS?

>>> On 29.10.13 at 11:52, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Xen should be able to arbitrate which one gets the actual event 
> delivery, right?  So the only risk would be that another vcpu would 
> notice the pending interrupt and handle it itself.

As said before - for the FIFO model Xen's arbitration would be
sufficient (as long as affinity changes get carried out with
sufficient care), but for the legacy model several vCPU-s might
end up trying to service the event (since the pending bitmap is
per-domain, not per-vCPU)..


Xen-devel mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.