Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC 0 PATCH 3/3] PVH dom0: construct_dom0 changes

[George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 10/08/2013 10:57 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > On 08.10.13 at 11:39, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > If it were just a question of cleaning up those bits, I could probably
> > have another draft posted sometime this week.  But if we're stepping
> > back and looking at whether this is the right approach, or whether
> > something like Tim has suggested -- basically making PVH to be HVM minus
> > qemu plus a handful of hypercalls, and most of the changes in the domain
> > builder rather than in Xen -- that will take a bit longer, particularly
> > because it would probably mean me having to understand and modify the
> > Linux side of things as well.  At this point I'm not really sure what
> > the best approach is going forward.
> Indeed, this all sounds more like being in need of a discussion on
> the summit then (which however would very likely mean that this
> won't make 4.4).
Hmm, which will make my "PVH technical deep-dive" talk a bit challenging 
to write. :-)
Lars, any suggestions?  I could just back out the talk (which would 
reduce my talk-writing load a bit), or I could try to talk about things 
in general and the issues we've been discussing.
 -George

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel