Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-arm-xen baseline test] 19698: tolerable FAIL

[Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 2013-09-17 at 15:40 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> xen.org writes ("[linux-arm-xen baseline test] 19698: tolerable FAIL"):
> > "Old" tested version had not actually been tested; therefore in this
> > flight we test it, rather than a new candidate.  The baseline, if
> > any, is the most recent actually tested revision.
> > 
> > flight 19698 linux-arm-xen real [real]
> > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/19698/
> > 
> > Failures :-/ but no regressions.
> > 
> > Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
> ...
> >  build-armhf-pvops             4 kernel-build             fail   never pass
> 
>     BC      kernel/timeconst.h
>   /bin/sh: 1: bc: not found
>   make[1]: *** [kernel/timeconst.h] Error 127
>   make: *** [kernel] Error 2
> 
> I will arrange for bc to be installed.

Thanks!


How did I not see this I wonder -- I installed the box using ./ts-foo
and certainly didn't install anything extra by hand.

Oh well.

Ian.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel