|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V1 18/29] xen/arm: Don't map disabled device in DOM0
On 09/09/2013 12:40 PM, Ian Campbell wrote: On Wed, 2013-08-28 at 15:47 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:Linux should cope with 'status = "disabled"' in the Device Tree.This is devices which were disabled in the DT passed to Xen, rather than ones which we have disabled ourselves (e.g. the previous patch)? Yes. This solution can be used later to pass-through device to a specific guest.How? I thought disabled meant "not present/wired-up on this variant of the platform"? A user cannot be expected to edit the host DTB to enable passthrough. We might want a dtb_hide cmdline option, or to do it dynamically like pciback is capable of. Disabled also means "the device is not presently operational, but it might become operational in the future". Or maybe I'm wrong above and this is indeed devices we have disabled ourselves? I'm not sure it's usefull. But I don't see any reason to map disabled device in dom0.
-- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |