[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/5] xen/spinlock: We don't need the old structure anymore

To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@xxxxxxxxxx>
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 11:18:24 +0100
Cc: jeremy@xxxxxxxx, stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, stefan.bader@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 09 Sep 2013 10:19:05 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

On 07/09/13 14:46, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> As we are piggybacking on the generic ticketlock structs
> and these old structures are not needed anymore.

"As we are using the generic ticket lock..."

"piggybacking" suggests the Xen code isn't using a standard interface
for this.

Otherwise,

Reviewed-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>

David

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

References:
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Bug-fixes to enable PV ticketlock to work under Xen PVHVM with Linux v3.12. (v1)
  - From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/5] xen/spinlock: We don't need the old structure anymore
  - From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V1 08/29] xen/dts: Don't add a fake property "name" in the device tree
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/5] xen/spinlock: Fix locking path engaging too soon under PVHVM.
Previous by thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/5] xen/spinlock: We don't need the old structure anymore
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/5] xen/spinlock: We don't need the old structure anymore
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.