Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 18784: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass

[David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 28/08/13 16:24, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 18784: regressions - 
> trouble: broken/fail/pass"):
>> On 28.08.13 at 17:05, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> If you point me at something else to use as input to the push gate I
>>> would be happy to use that.
>>
>> I guess the kernel maintainers are in a better position to point out
>> the most stable tree/branch to follow for that purpose.
> 
> Is there a single branch or tag that always corresponds to the
> "current stable kernel" ?  Or do we have to update this every n months ?

No.  Each stable series has its own branch.

I would recommend using the 3.10.y stable tree which is the current
longterm stable tree.

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git

branch: linux-3.10.y

David

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel