Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/2] GLOBAL() macro for asm code.

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 26.08.13 at 21:18, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> This series has been split into two patches, one for arm and one for x86.  I
> figured that this was easier than doing it as a single combined patch,
> especially as the changes are functionally independent.
> 
> x86 has been boot tested, but arm has not even been compile tested as I lack 
> a
> suitable cross compiler.  However, the changes are just text replacement, so 
> I
> dont expect any issues.
> 
> The changes to {svm,vmx}/entry.S will conflict with Jan's series "HVM: 
> produce
> better binary code", which is why this patch is labled RFC.  I also recall
> that arm{32,64}/mode_switch.S was in the middle of being played with, so 
> might
> have issues there.  The patchs are on top of current staging.
> 
> Assuming the principle of the patches is fine, I dont mind in what order 
> these
> get committed. I can rebase this series on top of shortly upcoming series, 
> or
> if this gets in quickly, they can rebase on top of this.  Either way the
> conflicts will not be difficult, and I am happy to do whatever the 
> committers
> feel is easiest.

The x86 one is fine by me; I'll just queue this up behind my
VMX/SVM series, fixing up the fallout at once.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel