Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 1/3] xl: replace vcpu-set --ignore-host with --ignore-warn

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

George Dunlap writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 1/3] xl: replace vcpu-set 
--ignore-host with --ignore-warn"):
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 8:17 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
> > Good point. In which case I think --no-warn and no short option
> > makes the most sense.
> 
> TBH the no-warning option seems a bit unnecessary, and a part of me
> thinks just making it possible to do without an override should be
> enough.

I agree.

Also we need to keep accepting the previously-introduced option name,
so that existing users don't break.  xl should have
forward-compatibility.  But we can just ignore the option if the
behaviour it requests becomes the default.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel