Re: [Xen-devel] [V10 PATCH 00/23]PVH xen: Phase I, Version 10 patches...

[Keir Fraser <keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 24/07/2013 13:24, "Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>>> These V10 patches are in pretty good shape. I've addressed all the
>>> issues Jan had in previous versions, and jfyi, he and I've been back
>>> and forth on pretty much every patch in this series. Lot of the patches
>>> have 'acked' or 'reviewed' tags. Kindly review.
>> These need to get in the tree now, or they're going to miss yet another
>> cycle. Hasn't it been two/three years?
>> 
>> Acked-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
> 
> Other than my minor nit in patch 4,
> 
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> If possible, I will see about putting these patches in and running a
> standard set of regression tests.  Given the extent of changes to both
> regular HVM and PV guests, it would be nice to know if there are any
> obvious problems caused by the introduction of PVH.

That would be most excellent, thank you!

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel