[Xen-devel] Performance of Xen VCPU Scheduling

[Marcus Granado <marcus.granado@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hello,

I observed that a configuration where dom0 vcpus were pinned to a set of 
pcpus in the host using dom0_vcpus_pin and the guests were prevented 
from running on the dom0 pcpus (here called "exclusively-pinned dom0 
vcpus", or xpin) caused the general performance of the guests in a host 
with around 24 pcpus or more to increase during bootstorms and high 
density of guests, even though there were less pcpus available to the 
guests.
While trying to understand why this increased performance is not present 
in the default non-pinned state and if it would be possible to obtain 
this extra performance in the default non-pinned dom0 configuration, 
Matthew Portas and I evaluated lots of Xen 4.2 parameters and patches:
http://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Performance_of_Xen_VCPU_Scheduling

We put some of the results that we thought would be of interest to this 
list in the link above, and we invite everybody here to have a look. We 
are especially interested in having some feedback on the prototype 
section, and to find out if anyone has further ideas for patches and if 
the listed patches are reasonable or could have side-effects.
Interesting results in the link above:
- xpin decreases startup time of vms in a bootstorm
- xpin has a pathological case when the vms are burning lots of cpu
- nopin produces an interesting cluster of high event channel latency 
between 100us-1000us when enough vms are using lots of cpu
- experimental tweaks on the xen credit1 scheduler code that cause the 
xpin pathological case to go away, and other increases (and sometimes 
decreases) in bootstorm and vm density performance.
cheers,
Marcus

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel