|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V5 2/2] xenbus: delay xenbus frontend resume if xenstored is not running
>>> On 28.05.13 at 19:09, Aurelien Chartier <aurelien.chartier@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
> If the xenbus frontend is located in a domain running xenstored, the device
> resume is hanging because it is happening before the process resume. This
> patch adds extra logic to the resume code to check if we are the domain
> running xenstored and delay the resume if needed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aurelien Chartier <aurelien.chartier@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Instead of bypassing the resume, process it in a workqueue
> Changes in v3:
> - Add a struct work in xenbus_device to avoid dynamic allocation
> - Several small code fixes
> Changes in v4:
> - Use a dedicated workqueue
> Changes in v5:
> - Move create_workqueue error handling to xenbus_frontend_dev_resume
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
Yet nevertheless I'm still seeing room for improvement:
> +static int xenbus_frontend_dev_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + /*
> + * If xenstored is running in this domain, we cannot access the backend
> + * state at the moment, so we need to defer xenbus_dev_resume
> + */
> + if (xen_store_domain_type == XS_LOCAL) {
> + struct xenbus_device *xdev = to_xenbus_device(dev);
> +
> + if (!xenbus_frontend_wq) {
> + pr_err("%s: no workqueue to process delayed resume\n",
> + xdev->nodename);
> + return -EFAULT;
Issuing a message here is fine, but I think you should also issue a
pr_warn() at initialization time.
> + }
> +
> + INIT_WORK(&xdev->work, xenbus_frontend_delayed_resume);
And I also think that this would better be done once at initialization
time too.
> + queue_work(xenbus_frontend_wq, &xdev->work);
> +
> + return 0;
> + }
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |