Re: [Xen-devel] [Hackathon minutes] PV frontends/backends and NUMA machines

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 21.05.13 at 12:58, Dario Faggioli <raistlin@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On mar, 2013-05-21 at 11:43 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 21.05.13 at 12:30, Dario Faggioli <raistlin@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > I remember such discussion (which, BTW, is here:
>> > http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2012-08/msg00332.html ).
>> > However, wasn't that supposed to help only in case you want to confine
>> > Dom0 on one specific node?
>> > 
>> > That would definitely be already something, but not quite the same thing
>> > that came up in Dublin, and that George was describing above (although I
>> > agree it covers a sensible subset of it :-) ).
>> 
>> I certainly meant to implement both such that multiple nodes would
>> be permitted.
>> 
> Well, sure, but then, again, how do you control which (and not only how
> much) memory is taken from which node?

Hmm, I may not have followed, but why is "which" important here at
all? The only (usual) restriction should apply regarding preservation of
memory below 4G.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel