|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Bug report and patch about IRQ freezing after gic_restore_state
On 05/20/2013 01:41 AM, Jaeyong Yoo wrote:
Hello,
> I'm running xen on Arndale board and if I run both iperf and du command at
> Dom0,
> one of IRQ (either SATA or network) suddenly stop occuring anymore.
> After some investigation, I found out that when context switching at Xen,
> IRQs in LR (about to be delivered to Doms) could be lost and never occur
> anymore.
> Here goes function call sequence that this problem occurs:
> (in context switching)
> - schedule_tail
> - ctxt_switch_from
> - local_irq_enable
> - // after this part, some IRQ can occur and could be directly written
> to LR
> - ctxt_switch_to
> - ... (some more functions)
> - // before the above IRQ is delivered to Dom (and maintenance IRQ
> not called),
> // gic_restore_state can be called
> - gic_restore_state /* when restoring gic state, the above IRQ
> * (written to LR) is overwritten
> * to the previous values, and somehow,
> * the corresponding IRQ never occur
> again */
>
> I made the following patch (i.e., enable local irq after gic_restore_state)
> for preventing the above problem.
Thanks for the patch, I was looking with a similar error on the Arndale
Board for a couple of day.
> Signed-off-by: Jaeyong Yoo <jaeyong.yoo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> xen/arch/arm/domain.c | 4 ++--
> xen/arch/arm/gic.c | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain.c
> index f71b582..2c3b132 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/domain.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain.c
> @@ -141,6 +141,8 @@ static void ctxt_switch_to(struct vcpu *n)
> /* VGIC */
> gic_restore_state(n);
> + local_irq_enable();
> +
Could you move the local_irq_enable right after ctxt_switch_to?
> /* XXX VFP */
> /* XXX MPU */
> @@ -215,8 +217,6 @@ static void schedule_tail(struct vcpu *prev)
> {
> ctxt_switch_from(prev);
> - local_irq_enable();
> -
> /* TODO
> update_runstate_area(current);
> */
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
> index d4f0a43..8186ad8 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
> @@ -81,11 +81,11 @@ void gic_restore_state(struct vcpu *v)
> if ( is_idle_vcpu(v) )
> return;
> - spin_lock_irq(&gic.lock);
> + spin_lock(&gic.lock);
> this_cpu(lr_mask) = v->arch.lr_mask;
> for ( i=0; i<nr_lrs; i++)
> GICH[GICH_LR + i] = v->arch.gic_lr[i];
> - spin_unlock_irq(&gic.lock);
> + spin_unlock(&gic.lock);
As the IRQ is disabled and the GICH registers can only be modified by
the current physical CPU, I think you can remove the spin_{,un}lock and
replace it by a dsb.
> GICH[GICH_APR] = v->arch.gic_apr;
> GICH[GICH_HCR] = GICH_HCR_EN;
> isb();
Cheers,
--
Julien
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |