Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] xen: handle paged gfn in wrmsr_hypervisor_regs

[Olaf Hering <olaf@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, May 03, Jan Beulich wrote:

> >>> On 03.05.13 at 16:26, Keir Fraser <keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I suggest the following return codes:
> >  0: not handled
> >  1: handled
> >  -EINVAL: error during handling
> >  -EAGAIN: retry
> > 
> > The HVM callers should then handle as follows:
> >  -EAGAIN: rc = X86EMUL_RETRY
> >  -EINVAL: goto gp_fault
> >  0: try other msr handlers (if any)
> >  1: we're done, return X86EMUL_OKAY
> > 
> > Does that make sense?
> 
> Sure - you may have seen my later reply where I also notide
> this mistake in my first response to Olaf.

I sent v3 of the patch. I had to guess which 'return 0' is supposed to
be an error.

Olaf

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel