[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.3 related documents - these need review and improvement in the coming weeks
>>> On 30.04.13 at 11:41, Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On 30/04/2013 08:00, Jan Beulich wrote: >> I fixed what was obvious, but I wonder where the OVMF/Tianocore >> line originates from: This was disabled in 4.2 (as it didn't build except >> with one specific gcc version iirc), and I didn't see its state change >> in -unstable. And in any event - afaict - this is at best experimental. >> > Thank you Jan. Looking at the logs this line came from Ian Campbell > (added this to 4.2 on Sept 10 2012). > I am happy to mark this as disabled (footnote [4]) and/or experimental. > Any views? Ian? > On 30/04/2013 09:02, Dietmar Hahn wrote: >> The description for vPMU is stated with "Virtual Power Management Unit >> for HVM guests". On xen-devel vPMU is normally meant to be "Virtual >> Performance Monitoring Unit" >> So what is meant here? >> Dietmar. > That is a good question. Again, looking at the logs, Ian Campbell added > these in the same batch as the item above. Probably just a typo. Please > somebody make a call and advise. I guess if it is Virtual Performance > Monitoring Unit, this line should probably also go into the "Tooling" header I saw your reply to this already, so we seem to be all in agreement that this is a typo... Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |