Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.3 related documents - these need review and improvement in the coming weeks

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 30.04.13 at 11:41, Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 30/04/2013 08:00, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> I fixed what was obvious, but I wonder where the OVMF/Tianocore
>> line originates from: This was disabled in 4.2 (as it didn't build except
>> with one specific gcc version iirc), and I didn't see its state change
>> in -unstable. And in any event - afaict - this is at best experimental.
>>
> Thank you Jan. Looking at the logs this line came from Ian Campbell 
> (added this to 4.2 on Sept 10 2012).
> I am happy to mark this as disabled (footnote [4]) and/or experimental. 
> Any views?

Ian?

> On 30/04/2013 09:02, Dietmar Hahn wrote:
>> The description for vPMU is stated with "Virtual Power Management Unit 
>> for HVM guests". On xen-devel vPMU is normally meant to be "Virtual 
>> Performance Monitoring Unit"
>> So what is meant here?
>> Dietmar. 
> That is a good question. Again, looking at the logs, Ian Campbell added 
> these in the same batch as the item above. Probably just a typo. Please 
> somebody make a call and advise. I guess if it is Virtual Performance 
> Monitoring Unit, this line should probably also go into the "Tooling" header

I saw your reply to this already, so we seem to be all in agreement
that this is a typo...

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel