[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 04/13] xen/arm: support for guest SGI
On 24 April 2013 21:07, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Trap writes to GICD_SGIR, parse the requests, inject SGIs into the right > guest vcpu. > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Changes in v3: > - make use of cpumask_from_bitmap. > --- > xen/arch/arm/vgic.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > xen/include/asm-arm/gic.h | 3 ++ > 2 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c b/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c > index b30da78..8912aab 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c > @@ -370,6 +370,7 @@ static void vgic_enable_irqs(struct vcpu *v, uint32_t r, > int n) > > static int vgic_distr_mmio_write(struct vcpu *v, mmio_info_t *info) > { > + struct domain *d = v->domain; > struct hsr_dabt dabt = info->dabt; > struct cpu_user_regs *regs = guest_cpu_user_regs(); > register_t *r = select_user_reg(regs, dabt.reg); > @@ -498,11 +499,55 @@ static int vgic_distr_mmio_write(struct vcpu *v, > mmio_info_t *info) > goto write_ignore; > > case GICD_SGIR: > - if ( dabt.size != 2 ) goto bad_width; > - printk("vGICD: unhandled write %#"PRIregister" to ICFGR%d\n", > - *r, gicd_reg - GICD_ICFGR); > - return 0; > - > + { > + cpumask_t vcpu_mask; > + int virtual_irq; > + int filter; > + int vcpuid; > + struct vcpu *vt; > + int i; > + unsigned long bits; > + > + if ( dabt.size != 2 ) goto bad_width; > + > + filter = (*r & GICD_SGI_TARGET_LIST_MASK); > + virtual_irq = (*r & GICD_SGI_INTID_MASK); > + > + cpumask_clear(&vcpu_mask); > + switch ( filter ) > + { > + case GICD_SGI_TARGET_LIST: > + bits = (*r & GICD_SGI_TARGET_MASK) >> > GICD_SGI_TARGET_SHIFT; > + vcpu_mask = cpumask_from_bitmap(&bits, 8); > + break; > + case GICD_SGI_TARGET_OTHERS: > + for ( i = 0; i < d->max_vcpus; i++ ) > + { > + if ( i != current->vcpu_id && d->vcpu[i] != NULL ) > + cpumask_set_cpu(i, &vcpu_mask); > + } > + case GICD_SGI_TARGET_SELF: > + vcpu_mask = *cpumask_of(current->vcpu_id); > + break; > + default: > + printk("vGICD: unhandled GICD_SGIR write %x with wrong > TargetListFilter field\n", *r); > + return 0; > + } > + > + for_each_cpu( vcpuid, &vcpu_mask ) > + { > + if ( vcpuid >= d->max_vcpus || (vt = d->vcpu[vcpuid]) == > NULL || > + virtual_irq >= 16 ) > + { > + printk("vGICD: GICD_SGIR write r=%x vcpu_mask=%lx, wrong > CPUTargetList\n", > + *r, *cpumask_bits(&vcpu_mask)); > + return 0; > + } > + vgic_vcpu_inject_irq(vt, virtual_irq, 1); > + } > + return 1; > + } > + > case GICD_CPENDSGIR ... GICD_CPENDSGIRN: > if ( dabt.size != 0 && dabt.size != 2 ) goto bad_width; > printk("vGICD: unhandled %s write %#"PRIregister" to ICPENDSGIR%d\n", > diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/gic.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/gic.h > index 92711d5..4f2c8b8 100644 > --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/gic.h > +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/gic.h > @@ -51,12 +51,15 @@ > #define GICD_SPENDSGIRN (0xF2C/4) > #define GICD_ICPIDR2 (0xFE8/4) > > +#define GICD_SGI_TARGET_LIST_SHIFT (24) > +#define GICD_SGI_TARGET_LIST_MASK (0x3UL << GICD_SGI_TARGET_LIST_SHIFT) > #define GICD_SGI_TARGET_LIST (0UL<<24) > #define GICD_SGI_TARGET_OTHERS (1UL<<24) > #define GICD_SGI_TARGET_SELF (2UL<<24) > #define GICD_SGI_TARGET_SHIFT (16) > #define GICD_SGI_TARGET_MASK (0xFFUL<<GICD_SGI_TARGET_SHIFT) > #define GICD_SGI_GROUP1 (1UL<<15) > +#define GICD_SGI_INTID_MASK (0xFUL) > > #define GICC_CTLR (0x0000/4) > #define GICC_PMR (0x0004/4) > -- > 1.7.2.5 > > Hi, I've been running crashme ( executing random instructions ) on Xen on Arm installed on an Arndale board. I'm using Julien's dom0 and Xen branch. The Xen branch wasn't updated in a few days. I managed to crash Xen from dom0 userspace: (XEN) (XEN) **************************************** (XEN) Panic on CPU 1: (XEN) Unhandled SGI 2 on CPU1 (XEN) **************************************** (XEN) (XEN) Reboot in five seconds... Tracking this back to the source: xen/arch/arm/gic.c:648 static void do_sgi xen/arch/arm/gic.c:671 void gic_interrupt >From what I understood from the source all sgi's except 0 & 1 would/will cause this panic since they are just not handled. I was wondering if this patch would fix that because going over it didn't convince me it would. The reason I'm asking and not just trying it because it's not easy to reproduce a crashme crash. Sander > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |