[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 2/7] xen/arm: SMP support



On Thu, 25 Apr 2013, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > @@ -216,6 +245,8 @@ static int __init xen_guest_init(void)
> > > >          * is required to use VCPUOP_register_vcpu_info to place vcpu 
> > > > info
> > > >          * for secondary CPUs as they are brought up. */
> > > >         per_cpu(xen_vcpu, 0) = &HYPERVISOR_shared_info->vcpu_info[0];
> > > > +       for_each_online_cpu(i)
> > > > +               xen_secondary_init(i);
> > > >  
> > > >         gnttab_init();
> > > >         if (!xen_initial_domain())
> > > [...]
> > > > @@ -244,7 +280,7 @@ static int __init xen_init_events(void)
> > > >                 return -EINVAL;
> > > >         }
> > > >  
> > > > -       enable_percpu_irq(xen_events_irq, 0);
> > > > +       on_each_cpu(xen_percpu_enable_events, NULL, 0);
> > > 
> > > It feels like there ought to be some sort of per-cpu bringup callback
> > > which takes care of these dynamically. Maybe that doesn't matter until
> > > we get vcpu hotplug going?
> > 
> > I suspect there isn't one, considering that on_each_cpu is also used by 
> > kvm_vgic_hyp_init, kvm_timer_hyp_init and others.
> 
> Could we use cpu_notifiers for this?

cpu_notifiers are for cpu hotplug, not for secondary cpu bringup

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.