[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8 2/2] ARM: Enable selection of SMP operations at boot time
On Thu, 25 Apr 2013, Will Deacon wrote: > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 07:40:19PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > From: Jon Medhurst <tixy@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Add a new 'smp_init' hook to machine_desc so platforms can specify a > > function to be used to setup smp ops instead of having a statically > > defined value. The hook must return true when smp_ops are initialized. > > If false the static mdesc->smp_ops will be used by default. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jon Medhurst <tixy@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx> > > --- > > arch/arm/include/asm/mach/arch.h | 4 ++++ > > arch/arm/kernel/setup.c | 10 ++++++---- > > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > [...] > > > if (is_smp()) { > > - if (psci_smp_available()) > > - smp_set_ops(&psci_smp_ops); > > - else if (mdesc->smp) > > - smp_set_ops(mdesc->smp); > > + if (!mdesc->smp_init || !mdesc->smp_init()) { > > Minor nit, but this feels backwards to me. We usually return 0 on success, > yet we're saying here that if mdesc->smp_init() returns 0, then we go and > override the smp ops. I am OK with changing the interface to return an int instead of a bool, but given that Nicolas is the main user of smp_init at the moment, I'll wait for his opinion. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |