[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/4] xen/arm: support for guest SGI
On Tue, 9 Apr 2013, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Thu, 2013-03-21 at 18:42 +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > Trap writes to GICD_SGIR, parse the requests, inject SGIs into the right > > guest vcpu. > > > > Add a useful debug printk to vgic_vcpu_inject_irq. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > xen/arch/arm/vgic.c | 53 > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > > xen/include/asm-arm/gic.h | 3 ++ > > 2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c b/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c > > index 8495384..26279f9 100644 > > --- a/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c > > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c > > @@ -370,6 +370,7 @@ static void vgic_enable_irqs(struct vcpu *v, uint32_t > > r, int n) > > > > static int vgic_distr_mmio_write(struct vcpu *v, mmio_info_t *info) > > { > > + struct domain *d = v->domain; > > struct hsr_dabt dabt = info->dabt; > > struct cpu_user_regs *regs = guest_cpu_user_regs(); > > uint32_t *r = select_user_reg(regs, dabt.reg); > > @@ -498,10 +499,51 @@ static int vgic_distr_mmio_write(struct vcpu *v, > > mmio_info_t *info) > > goto write_ignore; > > > > case GICD_SGIR: > > - if ( dabt.size != 2 ) goto bad_width; > > - printk("vGICD: unhandled write %#"PRIx32" to ICFGR%d\n", > > - *r, gicd_reg - GICD_ICFGR); > > - return 0; > > + { > > + cpumask_t vcpu_mask; > > + int virtual_irq; > > + int filter; > > + int vcpuid; > > + struct vcpu *vt; > > + int i; > > + > > + if ( dabt.size != 2 ) goto bad_width; > > + > > + filter = (*r & GICD_SGI_TARGET_LIST_MASK); > > + virtual_irq = (*r & GICD_SGI_INTID_MASK); > > + > > + cpumask_clear(&vcpu_mask); > > + switch ( filter ) > > + { > > + case GICD_SGI_TARGET_LIST: > > + cpumask_bits(&vcpu_mask)[0] = (*r & > > GICD_SGI_TARGET_MASK) >> GICD_SGI_TARGET_SHIFT; > > Is this the best available way to set a cpumask in Xen? We could probably use cpumask_or to set the bits in vcpu_mask, but I don't think it would be a great improvement. > > + break; > > + case GICD_SGI_TARGET_OTHERS: > > + for ( i = 0; i < d->max_vcpus; i++ ) > > + { > > + if ( i != current->vcpu_id && d->vcpu[i] != NULL ) > > + cpumask_set_cpu(i, &vcpu_mask); > > Can this be done with cpumask_any/all and then clearing the current cpu? cpumask_all doesn't actually exist and I don't see a way to use cpumask_any to improve this code. If we were dealing with pcpus, we could use cpu_online_map and cpumask_clear_cpu, but given that they are vcpus, I don't think we can do much better than this. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |