[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8 1/2] xen: introduce vcpu_block and vcpu_block_enable_events
On 23/04/2013 08:23, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> On 22.04.13 at 22:00, Keir Fraser <keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 22/04/2013 18:42, "Stefano Stabellini" <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >>> Rename do_block to vcpu_block. >>> >>> Move the call to local_event_delivery_enable out of vcpu_block, to a new >>> function called vcpu_block_enable_events. >>> >>> Use vcpu_block_enable_events instead of do_block throughout in >>> schedule.c >> >> While you're there, could you make both vcpu_block variants return void? > > And I don't see why vcpu_block_enable_events() needs to > become non-static... I must admit that I don't mind, no reason not to make it part of the API of the scheduler, even if noone else uses it yet. OTOH I don't have a very strong opinion either way. -- Keir > Jan > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |