Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 0/5] Add posted interrupt supporting

[George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 18/04/13 01:19, Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
> Keir Fraser wrote on 2013-04-18:
> > On 17/04/2013 13:53, "George Dunlap" <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 8:04 AM, Keir Fraser <keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > On 17/04/2013 07:50, "Yang Zhang" <yang.z.zhang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > From: Yang Zhang <yang.z.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > The whole series:
> > > >
> > > > Acked-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
> > > Keir / Yang, any comments on risks to the release?
> > >
> > > Yang, what kinds of testing are you guys going to be doing of this
> > > between now and the 4.3 release?
> > >
> > >  From a feature / risk of slip perspective, I think this is probably
> > > good.  The key thing I think is making sure that if there is a bug, it
> > > will be caught before the release.  I suspect that a lot of people
> > > won't have hardware to test this, so it will be up to Intel to make
> > > sure the code has "gone through its paces" and is ready for public
> > > consumption in 2 months' time.
> > Personally I think it should go in, if Intel can assure they have done
> > decent testing internally (and will continue to do so).
> Yes, we did many testing: beside our regular testing, we also did some stress 
> testing(boot guest and scp large file continually). And we didn't see any issue.
> Also, we will put APICv testing into our nightly testing system to make sure it 
> works well.
Sounds good.  So from a release perspective:

Acked-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel