Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v15] claim and its friends for allocating multiple self-ballooning guests.

[George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 16/04/13 11:57, Ian Jackson wrote:
> George Dunlap writes ("Re: [PATCH v15] claim and its friends for allocating multiple 
> self-ballooning guests."):
> > On 12/04/13 18:20, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > This series is very close.  I'm picking tiny nits.  In the event it
> > > doesn't make feature code freeze I'd like to propose a freeze
> > > exception for it.  The hypervisor side is in tree already and the code
> > > has been floating around on the list for a long time.  The tools parts
> > > are pretty obvious and getting the API design right is what has been
> > > taking the extra time.
> > The key question here from the "code freeze" perspective is, "Will
> > accepting this patch now potentially cause a regression which will delay
> > the release?"
> No.
Then it looks good to me.  From a release perspective:

Acked-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel