|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V2] Add CPUID bit mask for Performance Counter Extension
Is there any other concerns about this patch? Thanks, Suravee On 3/25/2013 2:30 PM, Suravee Suthikulanit wrote: Sorry. I missed this email from the mailing list thread. Please see my answer below.On 3/6/2013 4:10 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 05:01:26PM -0600, suravee.suthikulpanit@xxxxxxx wrote:Guest should not need to config anything. The patch allows the host's CPUID bit to be passed on to guest. However, users can also force the CPUID bits to set/clear by specifying:Adding CPUID bit mask for Performance Counter Extension. The extendedcounter MSRs are already virtualized. This bit mask allows the initializationcode to properly detect the feature and enable the use of counters.Just to be clear, to make use of this, the guest config has to have cpuid="perfctr_core"cpuid = "host,perfctr_core=0"This is AMD specific CPUID flag, and therefore is specified in the "amd_xc_cpuid_policy".Is this something that is the same for Intel hardware? Meaning is the code path in xl the same for enabling performance counters on Intel?Suravee. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |